![]() After Acoustat went south, Jim Strickland, the original engineer, wound up designing the last of the Hafler amps, at least as I understand it.īeveridge-totally different kind of sonic presentation, like bathing in or being immersed in sound. Rockford bought them (along with Hafler) and soon it was all over. I have no idea why they went south since the company sold a lot of them, and they were not expensive in the electrostatic scheme of things. Sounded best at least four feet from any back or side wall, making placement a lot more difficult than the usual box speaker. Possibly because that's what the panel was made out of? Needed a powerful amplifier that could pump out the watts into low impedances Beamed terribly. ![]() Impressive at first, but after a while I began to notice a plastic-like quality to the sound. I'd like a pair right now.Īcoustat 2+2-overall sound quality not as nice as the Quad, but played louder with lower subjective bass. What can you say? My experience with it was with the old 303 amp. Harvey Rosenberg sold specially modified price no object Futterman OTL amps for it. ![]() Peter Aczel rated it as one of the best speakers of all time. Quad ESL (original)-sounds first rate at low levels but can't play loud, and beams terribly. ![]() I like them, and have owned them, but overall they have the wrong trade-offs for me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |